Prioritizing Cybersecurity – The Emergence of CVEs

Prioritizing Cybersecurity: The Business-Centric Approach

In today’s fast-paced digital landscape, organizations across industries face an overwhelming number of cybersecurity challenges. As new vulnerabilities emerge daily, decision-makers grapple with determining which ones deserve immediate attention and resources. Given the budgetary constraints that most organizations face, this decision becomes even more critical.

Understanding The Daily Cyber Threat Landscape

Every day sees the emergence of new Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs), each with its specific level of criticality, importance, and impact. Their frequency and varied nature can be likened to a constant stream of potential risks knocking on an organization’s door. Two key observations about these CVEs:

  • Frequency: CVEs are not an occasional threat. They are a persistent, daily concern.
  • Variability: Not all CVEs are created equal. They differ greatly in terms of criticality, significance to specific industries, and the potential direct impact they could have on individual facilities.
Daily Cyber Threat Landscape

Deciphering the CVSS: A Step Towards Prioritization

To assist organizations in managing these threats, the National Vulnerability Database (NVD), published through the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), provides the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS). This system essentially scores each CVE on a risk ranking, ranging from 0-10.

However, while this provides an initial guideline, it’s only the tip of the iceberg. Using the CVSS as the sole criterion might be like using a compass without a map—it gives directions but doesn’t consider the nuances of the journey. CVSS scores are useful, yet they lack insights into industry-specific, facility-specific, or unique business concerns.

A More Tailored Approach: Integrating Business Concerns

There are digital tools that add layers of complexity beyond standard CVSS scoring. They incorporate risk-weighted factors such as data sensitivity, connectivity, criticality, and safety, which can be adjusted to align with a facility’s specific concerns. 

This toolkit broadens the scope even further. Beyond just technical insights, it integrates business vectors and levers, considering both technical and non-technical assets, whether sourced externally or input directly. 

When combined, these tools offer a risk-based approach that synchronizes business-driven prioritization with cybersecurity concerns. It’s an illustration of how prioritization can be tailored to address both the general threats present in the marketplace and the unique challenges intrinsic to individual businesses.

A Holistic Approach to Cybersecurity

While specialized tools offer valuable insights, it’s vital to remember that a genuinely effective cybersecurity strategy encompasses technical, non-technical, and business drivers. It’s not about finding a one-size-fits-all solution but about crafting a plan that recognizes the distinctive attributes and requirements of your industry and organization.

Final Thoughts

In the realm of cybersecurity, navigating the myriad of threats can seem daunting. However, by employing a business-centric approach to prioritization and leveraging specialized tools, organizations can ensure they are directing their resources wisely. After all, in an interconnected digital world, the right strategy isn’t just about prevention; it’s about aligning cybersecurity efforts with broader organizational goals.

Scroll to Top